HARRY REID: Energy & Fuel Economy Standards
Wednesday, September 24th, 2008 at
8:00 pm
PoliticsTV’s Pia Shivdasani spoke with Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid. In this clip, Sen. Reid is asked about the energy bill and plans to improve fuel economy standards for vehicles in the United States.
Duration : 0:2:13
Tagged with: automakers • bill • cafe • economy • energy • environonmental • fuel • harry • politicstv • reid • suvs
Filed under: budget living
Like this post? Subscribe to my RSS feed and get loads more!
fuck harry reid!
harry reid!
We must stop our …
We must stop our independence on foreign oil?
I say drill, drill, drill you imperious Jag.
impeach him and his …
impeach him and his partner in crime Nancy
hack? isnt that an …
hack? isnt that an insult to hacks. Harry is the biggest whimp in congress what an embarrassment
People of Arizona, …
People of Arizona, one question. Why would you send this hack to Washington to represent your great state?
Καλησπέρα σας, το …
Καλησπέρα σας, το προϊόν πραγματικά δουλεύει, υπάρχει και στην Ελλάδα.
Σκεφτείτε λογικά, γιατί λοιπόν να δυσανασχετούμε με την αύξηση των τιμών του πετρελαίου και να μην το εξοικονομούμε με δυνατότητα να χτίσουμε μία δικιά μας επιχείρηση βασιζόμενοι σε αυτό το φαινόμενο???
Επικοινωνήστε μαζί μου στο εεξι εννεα εννεα οκτω τεσσερα μηδεν τεσσερα μηδεν εξι εννεα ή στειλτε μου εμαιλ στο ινφο παπακι αυτοσεκο τελεια κομ.
Ευχαριστώ
Good day.
There is …
Good day.
There is a new product based in aero space technology which economize the fuel.
Why should we pay more for fuel’s prices increasing and dont economize our money with offering to ourselfes bussiness opportunity for whole life?
Communicate with me: zero zero six nine nine eight four zero four zero six one or send an email in info @ autoseco . com
Harry Reid is an …
Harry Reid is an idiot. He thinks that banning nuclear power and preventing new energy plants from being built will improve the situation and be less harmful to the environment. Now we have to continue to use the old, less efficient, and environmentally harmful coal plants. Reid obviously hates the environment and would rather have us use candles instead of electricity in our homes.
Legal recourse is …
Legal recourse is the ONLY way to change the laws. What are you going to do, protest them into change? Once the commie-socialists take the white house in 2008 we will all be LESS than criminals. See you in the slave camps!
So if our …
So if our government does something wrong, we are not allowed to say anything? What good is legal recourse when the laws need to be changed? But I guess I shouldn’t worry too much. Once H.R. 1955 is passed, we will all be thought criminals.
See, now you are …
See, now you are making umptions about my political make-up just based on a very small amount of info. Why is that wrong? What little website?
So dead people …
So dead people shouldn’t be heard? Sammy was and still IS very funny, dead though he may be. I was going to play along with you without being mean, but now you are pushing it!
What’s wrong with …
What’s wrong with the original version?
Not at all. I just …
Not at all. I just think one must separate the “talking points” of either side from the reality. I do think protest is wrong by nature, preferring legal recourse instead. North America.
I suppose the main …
I suppose the main reason I find your comments so disturbing is that, taken in their entirety, they seem to imply that no one should be allowed to disagree with their government and that all protest is by its very nature wrong. What America did you wake up in this morning?
Here is a news …
Here is a news flash: EVERYONE can voice their disapproval with our government AT ANY TIME. We can be stubborn. We can be loud. We can sound stupid, in your opinion or anyone else’s. We can even be wrong. Have you ever read the constitution? Not googled it, READ it? In fact, as long as I’m recommending books you will never read, how about America’s Constitution by Akhil Reed Amar? It contains the complete text of the U.S Constitution.
Sam Kinneson? Why …
Sam Kinneson? Why in the world would I listen to him? He’s been dead a long time and wasn’t that funny when he was alive. Yes, my thoughts are influenced by the books I have read — where else should I draw my opinions? From some faceless entity who can’t complete a comment thread without lacing it with abundant insults? Have you ever heard of the concept of the ad hominum attack?
As for Norman …
As for Norman Podhoretz, I’m surprised you don’t genuflect at the mere sight of his name! He is known as the grandfather of Neo-conservatism. Turn on include the “War on Terror”, bombing Iran back into the stone age and, based on some of his comments, appears to have a major man-crush on our current president. You see, I think that it is important to learn about both sides of an issue. And what about your little website? Who are it authors and what are their credentials?
Stanley Karnow was …
Stanley Karnow was a journalist for Time and Life magazine. He was in Vietnam reporting the entire Vietnam War. He won a Pulitzer, too for some of his other work. And yeah he also landed a spot on Nixon’s Enemies list. I suppose that makes him a Commie Pinko in your eyes.
Alright. You forced …
Alright. You forced the truth outta me. I am only posting this once. In 1942 we made a deal with Ho Chi Mihn that if he helped us kick the Japanese out, we would allow Viet Nam to be a free State. That deal was made by Office of Strategic Services, OSS the forerunner of the CIA. After the war, 1946, we flat renigged on the deal, and gave the country back to the French. That started the French-IndoChina War, which led to our involvement after 1954.
This sounds like …
This sounds like the answer that chick gave Sam Kinnison in the movie BACK TO SCHOOL!!! I swear that’s where you heard this!!! It was a MOVIE!!
Like your mom and …
Like your mom and dad who ASKED you to educate yourself? You wouldnt be called names if you didn’t say stupid . Why read these books? Who are these guys? I quoted you two prominent NVA Generals. They had NO reason to lie or spin. You are blinded by the leftist media. Give yourself a good whack on the head and start thinking freely. And TIE YER SHOE! NOW!!!! hahahaha –just f’in’ with you! At least you are thinking…that is probably a good thing…8-)
I still attribute …
I still attribute the loss of that war to bad decisions on the part of the government and military.
U.S aid to France …
U.S aid to France increased each year until the French finally gave up and pulled out of Vietnam in 1955. From that point until the onset of open hostilities, we were underwriting and supporting a series of corrupt, but non-communist, dictators. Again the U.S. sent more money, “advisors”, guns, bombs, trucks, troops and et cetera until the United States became the de facto aggressors propping up the latest puppet ruler in South Vietnam.
American was …
American was supplying aid to France in its attempts to re-capture its colony after WWII (Too young? Look it up. It’s in a book). This was a quid pro quo agreement to buy France’s support of NATO and America’s European post-war agenda.